Where a defendant insurance company was granted summary disposition in favor of defendant regarding a plaintiff policyholder’s claim for uninsured motorist benefits, a reversal is warranted because the trial court erred by concluding that it was necessary for the hit-and-run vehicle to directly impact his vehicle for him to be entitled to those benefits.
The post No-Fault Law — Uninsured motorist – ‘Substantial physical nexus’ first appeared on Michigan Lawyers Weekly.↧
